Skip to main content

The Vanishing of Megan Renee Foglesong

                       
   I DEDICATED SUNDOWN BY GORDON LIGHTFOOT TO THIS ENTRY. THE SONG IS ONE OF MY ALLTIME FAVORITE SONGS. LIGHTFOOT IS AN AMAZING SONGWRITER. WHEN ASKED WHAT THE SONG WAS ABOUT GORDON LIGHTFOOT IS QUOTED AS SAYING....

 "All it is, is a thought about a situation where someone is wondering what his loved one is doing at the moment. He doesn't quite know where she is. He's not ready to give up on her, either, and that's about all I got to say about that."

SO WHEN ITS PUT IN THAT CONTEXT. IT KINDA FITS.....
ALSO I HAD TO START MODERATING THIS BLOG COMMENTS BECAUSE A GROUP OF LOW LIFE INBREDS STARTED ATTACKING MEGAN'S CHARACTER. NOW I KNOW NONE OF YOU ARE MAN ENOUGH TO SAY ANYTHING LIKE THAT IN PERSON. YOU FEEL TOUGH ON YOUR KEYBOARDS. THAT'S FINE. OH AND MSDOXMA, NO MATTER HOW MANY TIMES YOU CONTINUE TO TRY AND COMMENT. I'M NOT PUBLISHING IT BITCH. YOU'D THINK AFTER LIKE THE 8TH TIME YOU'D STOP TRYING. YOU'D ALSO THINK YOU'D HAVE BETTER THINGS TO DO. LIKE GOING TO THE GYNO OR SOMETHING. NOW DAWN FOGLESONG IS SWEET AND CLASSY. AND SHE WON'T SAY ANYTHING MEAN BACK. LUCKILY I HAVE ENOUGH SHIT TALK FOR BOTH OF US. ONE MORE THING. FOR THOSE WHO DON'T CARE FOR MY LANGUAGE AND HOW I CONDUCT MYSELF. THERE IS A DISCLAIMER AT THE TOP OF MY BLOG'S HOMEPAGE FOR A REASON. IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT. DON'T READ MY BLOG. SIMPLE AS THAT. 


SUNDOWN
GORDON LIGHTFOOT




Name:Megan Renee Foglesong
DOB: 1/20/1994
Missing: Late Nov/Early Dec of 2015 (Her last activity on Facebook was 11/30/2015)
Missing From: Alden, Kansas (Megan was formerly of Oneida, Illinois)
Age:23
Height: 5'4 Weight: 150lbs (Fluctuates between 150-170lbs)
Hair: Sandy Blonde (Does occasionally dye her hair) 
Eyes: Green (Has glasses and contact lenses)
Tattoos: Infinity Sign on Right Chest, Flower on Left Hip, Dream Catcher on Left Calf, Heart on Left Wrist that reads "Thick Thin".
Scars: Long Scar on Right Thigh. (Received 19 stitches as a kid)
Piercings: Ears, Tongue, and Belly Button.

“The last time I talked to her was the day before Thanksgiving,” said Megan’s stepmother, Dawn Foglesong




* Megan was from Oneida, Illinois but moved to Alden, Kansas.
* Megan's Biological Mother Pam Lewis lives in Kansas.
* Megan's stepmom Dawn Foglesong and her biological father Todd have led the way in the search for their daughter.
* Was at the time in a relationship with David Madden who she met through her mother Pam.
* David Madden was once romantically involved with Megan's biological mom Pam.
* Megan was frequently physically and psychologically abused by David.
* David Madden once kidnapped Megan, Placed her in a straight jacket at gunpoint, and threatened to beat her.
* David and Megan had broken up several times due to her being abused.
* Was reported missing on 2/10/2016. Megan's lifestyle was the reason why there was a delay in reporting her missing. She was known to be spontaneous. But she never went extended lengths of time without contacting family or friends.
* November 30th she replied to a message a friend stating she was at her boyfriend's house again. (David Madden)
* On December 1st David Madden informed the local Sheriff that Megan had stolen from him and that they had got into an argument and she left.
* On December 7th a friend she had received help from during Thanksgiving received a text reply stating "I'm fine." The friend is not sure that the text was from Megan.
* Rice County Sheriff's Department was originally investigating the case. It has since been handed over to the Kansas Bureau of Investigation.
* KBI have confirmed that they believe Megan Foglesong is the victim of foul play
* Police state that Megan's phone records are a dead end since she had a prepaid phone number. Apparently her prepaid carrier doesn't keep records after 10 days.
* One of Megan's friends Angie Montgomery stated she received a call from Megan requesting her to pick her up. And that Megan was walking along a rural road in the rain. The friend was unable to do so at the time.
* Police have searched a farm and the Arkansas River based on tips received.
* There has been insinuation that Megan's disappearance is also connected to another missing persons case. (Charles McHenry)
* Pam was interviewed briefly for The Vanished Podcast and one thing that is interesting is she kept referring to Megan in the past tense. Like she knew her daughter was dead.
* Pam stated she was informed that Megan left to go to Colorado with someone else. (With one of David's friends)
* Pam has stated that she doesn't believe that David had anything to do with Megan's disappearance. She believes that its one of David's friends.
* Its said that Megan's relationship with her mother Pam was competitive.
* Pam was known as a "Party Mom".
* Dawn was informed by two of Megan's friends that Megan informed them that if she ever came up missing David did it.
* Not long after Megan disappeared one of David's friends had committed suicide. There was speculation that he may have known something about her disappearance. Friend being Cody Wayne Bryant.
* David will not speak to Megan's Family or help with searching for her.
* There was an unconfirmed sighting around Christmas at Guy's Liquor in Larned, Kansas. (This tip according to authorities "Didn't pan out".)

Article Quoted

A report she was last seen on Christmas at a liquor store in Larned “didn’t pan out,” 

Though reported missing in November, the investigation took on more earnestness in February, Treaster said, “after we got information creating suspicion.” He declined to reveal more.

* On Feb 26th (2017) a search warrant was issued on David Madden's house. There has been no updates since the search.



                                         Megan and her mom Pam Lewis on the left.


David Madden(Piece Of Shit)



Barton County Sheriff’s Office Service Log (12/3)


Kidnapping
At 5:06 p.m. at 464 SE 110 Avenue there was a report of David Madden kidnapping his ex-girlfriend Megan against her will and they are en route to Alden. Advised the subject has taken her before by gunpoint and placed her in a straight jacket and threatened and beat her

https://www.greatbendpost.com/2014/12/04/cop-shop-123/





                                  304 Steinmetz St. Alden, Kansas


                                                        Courtesy: Dawn Foglesong

                                     Courtesy: Dawn Foglesong

                                                     The Vanished Podcast Preview

                            

My Thoughts

DAVID MADDEN!
He either did something. Or knows who did it. And Pam Lewis knows more than she lets on.


Links:
Megan's Facebook
Dawn Foglesong's Facebook Page
Todd Foglesong's Facebook Page   
Pam Lewis Facebook Page
David Madden's Facebook
Angie Montgomery's Facebook Page
Dawn Foglesong's Youtube Channel
Bring Megan Home
NAMUS Page
Charlie Project Page
National Missing Person Directory
The Vanished Podcast
KAKE News Article/Search Warrant
Great Bend Post Article
The Laser Online Article
Salida Post Article 3/7/16
Great Bend Post/David Madden
2-16-2017 WQAD Article

Inquisitr Article
Interesting Military Case involving David Madden (Transcript copied and pasted below the entry)





STATE
v.
LASITER

North Carolina Court of AppealsFeb 28, 2006176 N.C. App. 768 (N.C. Ct. App. 2006)Full title
Onslow County No. 03 CRS 50813; 04 CRS 2282.

LEVINSON, Judge.
Defendant appeals his convictions and judgments for first degree murder and attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon. We find no error in the convictions, but remand for a new sentencing hearing on the attempted robbery charge.
The evidence presented at trial may be summarized as follows:
The body of Frank Faires was found in a wooded area off Shaw Highway in the Pender County/Onslow County area in the early morning hours of 23 January 2003 by Deputy Robert Ides of the Onslow County Sheriff's Department. David Madden, Brandon Maynes, and defendant were taken into custody as suspects in the murder of Faires. Madden testified that he, Maynes, and defendant were serving together in the U.S. Marine Corps stationed at Camp Lejeune. On the evening of 17 January 2003, the three men went out to drink at local bars. Maynes and defendant left Madden at Stroker's bar and did not see him again until the following morning. On the morning of 18 January 2003, Madden noticed defendant "had blood splattered on [the front of] his jeans." Madden asked defendant what defendant and Maynes had done the previous night. Defendant and Maynes both told him, "we killed somebody."
Maynes testified that he, Madden, and defendant went out to drink the evening of 17 January 2003. While they were drinking at the Orleans House, Maynes and defendant were approached by Faires, who was in an intoxicated condition. Defendant told Maynes he "was planning on beating [Faires] up and robbing him." Maynes, defendant, and Faires left the bar together in Maynes' truck, and drove about eight to ten miles on Highway 53 before pulling off the main road onto Cinnebar Lane. Maynes and defendant directed Faires to get out of the truck. Maynes next heard a "ping" that "sounded like a baseball bat hitting another pole or another baseball bat." Maynes walked to the side of the truck and saw Faires lying on his back with blood coming from his face and forehead. Defendant was standing over Faires, holding his aluminum baseball bat. Maynes then observed defendant swing the bat and strike Faires in the head. Maynes got back in the truck and heard "repetitive thumping of the baseball bat." Maynes and defendant put Faires' body in the back of the pickup truck, drove down highway 53, and turned onto a gravel road, where they left the body in a wooded area. Maynes and defendant then drove to a car wash, where they washed the baseball bat and the back of the truck. At the car wash, defendant threw Faires' clothing and some of Maynes' and defendant's clothing into a dumpster. They returned to Camp Lejune. Later that morning, Maynes told Madden that defendant killed somebody. During his testimony, Maynes narrated the events illustrated on a surveillance tape obtained from the car wash.
Several experts in blood and DNA analysis testified that blood samples matching Faires' blood was discovered on various items retrieved from the car wash dumpster. Faires' blood was found on two white tee-shirts. Samples of Faires' blood was also found on the rocker side panel of Maynes' vehicle. Dr. John Almeida, who performed an autopsy on Faires, determined Faires died of "blunt head trauma[.]"
The jury convicted defendant of first degree murder, on the theories of premeditation and deliberation and the felony murder rule, and attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon. Defendant was sentenced to life imprisonment for murder, and to 80-105 months' imprisonment for attempted robbery with a dangerous weapon. From these convictions and judgments, defendant appeals.
Defendant argues first that the trial court erred by denying his challenge for cause of prospective juror Huffman, on the grounds that her close ties with law enforcement personnel demonstrated she could not consider the case in a fair and impartial manner. We disagree. N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1212(9) (2005), setting forth the statutory grounds upon to challenge a juror for cause, provides in pertinent part that "[a] challenge for cause to an individual juror may be made by any party on the ground that the juror: . . . (9) For any other cause is unable to render a fair and impartial verdict."
Whether to grant a challenge for cause under N.C.G.S. § 15A-1212(9) is a matter left to the sound discretion of the trial court. The trial court has the opportunity to see and hear a juror and has the discretion, based on its observations and sound judgment, to determine whether a juror can be fair and impartial. . . . When the trial court is able to reasonably conclude the prospective juror can disregard prior knowledge and impressions, follow the trial court's instructions on the law, and render an impartial, independent decision based on the evidence, excusal is not mandatory.
State v. Jaynes353 N.C. 534, 546, 549 S.E.2d 179, 190 (2001) (citations and internal quotations omitted).
In State v. Lee, 292 N.C. 617, 625, 234 S.E.2d 574, 579 (1977), our Supreme Court held the trial court abused its discretion by failing to allow defense counsel to strike a prospective juror, the wife of a police officer, for cause. The Lee Court reasoned:
[T]he position of juror Frances Norvell was such that she was subject to strong influences which ran counter to defendant's right to a trial by an impartial jury. . . . We further note that the juror Norvell initially stated that she would have a tendency to lend more credibility to the testimony of the police officers than to a stranger. . . . Finally, Officer Johnny Moore, with whom the juror was acquainted, was an important State's witness[;] . . . it was by his corroborative testimony that the State sought to buttress the credibility of its only eye-witness.
In the instant case, the husband of the prospective juror was employed as a sergeant at the Onslow County jail at the time of trial and was a former courtroom bailiff. The Onslow County Sheriff was the uncle of the prospective juror's husband. Huffman knew the bailiff in the courtroom as well as one of the prosecuting attorneys. She also knew many other members of the sheriff's department, including one who subsequently testified as a witness for the State.
Huffman's relevant statements on voir dire follow:
[TRIAL COURT]: [Y]ou're saying to the State and to the defendant that you can sit on this case, listen to the evidence that you hear from the witness stand under oath, apply the law which I give you to that evidence and render a fair and impartial verdict. Is that what you're saying?
[Mrs. Huffman indicated her assent by raising her hand.]
. . . .
[Defense Counsel]: Ms. Huffman, When Judge Duke asked you if you thought you could be fair and impartial, initially you hesitated.
[Mrs. Huffman]: Unh huh.
[Defense Counsel]: Why is that?
[Mrs. Huffman]: Really, I don't know, because I reckon my husband is in jail with a lot of the prisoners and you know, I hear, well, I get him to talk to me when he comes home to release pressure on him, so — but I mean, he wouldn't speak to me during the trial or anything because he knows what he's supposed to do. [Defense Counsel]: Wouldn't it be a more fair answer then to Judge Duke's question whether you can be fair and impartial —
[Mrs. Huffman]: Probably not.
. . . .
[Defense Counsel]: Do you honestly feel that you can sit there, even knowing the way you smiled at [the prosecutor] like you recognize him, you dealt with him for lunch or whatever you guys did, do you really feel with all those things in your background or mind you can be absolutely fair to the defendant in this case?
[Mrs. Huffman]: Yes.
[Defense Counsel]: Why is that?
[Mrs. Huffman]: It's my duty to be fair.
. . . .
[Defense Counsel]: And the things you say your husband will tell you, you are not concerned that any of those things will come into your mind and have an affect [sic] on how you're going to decide this case?
[Mrs. Huffman]: No.
[Defense Counsel]: Why is that?
. . . .
[Mrs. Huffman]: Because I know what I'm supposed to do and because I've sat on a jury before and it's — I wouldn't speak about it or anything.
. . . .
[Mrs. Huffman]: I mean, I'll try to be as fair as I could.
[Defense Counsel]: And that's all we're talking about. Is your ability to be fair somehow affected? [Mrs. Huffman]: Yes. Oh — by my husband, no, no.
On this record, we cannot conclude the trial court abused its discretion in failing to allow trial counsel's challenge for cause. Huffman was questioned extensively, and repeatedly stated she could be fair and impartial. Huffman testified that neither her acquaintance with one of the prosecuting attorneys, nor her acquaintance with Deputy Ides, a witness for the State, would affect her ability to be fair. Huffman explained that her husband would not speak to her about the case during the trial, and asserted that her husband's contacts with the jail would not affect her ability to be fair.
The facts of the instant case reveal significant differences from those set forth in Lee. While Huffman was well acquainted with Onslow County law enforcement officers, she did not assert she would give their testimony more weight than that of other witnesses; instead, she steadfastly maintained she could be fair and impartial. "[A] juror's close relationship with a police officer, standing alone, is not grounds for a challenge for cause." Id. at 625, 234 S.E.2d at 579. Furthermore, "the trial judge is vested with broad discretionary powers in determining the competency of jurors and that discretion will not ordinarily be disturbed on appeal." Id. at 621, 234 S.E.2d at 577 (citations omitted). We conclude the trial court did not abuse its discretion in failing to grant defendant's challenge for cause. This assignment of error is overruled. Defendant next contends the trial court erred by overruling his objection to the testimony of the State's forensic serology expert, Jennifer Elwell, that a blood splatter pattern she observed on a tee-shirt was consistent with blood splattering "coming across the shoulder." Defendant argues the opinion offered by Elwell was outside her area of expertise and that defendant was prejudiced by its admission. We disagree.
In the instant case, Elwell was qualified as an expert in the field of forensic serology, the testing of items for the presence of blood. Over defendant's objection, Elwell was allowed to give her opinion regarding the presence of blood on a tee-shirt found at the car wash dumpster. Elwell stated, "With reference to this item, I did find chemical indications for the presence of blood, and I also noted that I found a blood splatter pattern consistent with a splattering coming across the shoulder[.]"
Defendant contends he was prejudiced by Elwell's testimony regarding a blood splatter on the tee-shirt because Elwell's testimony indicated that he, not Maynes, struck the victim with the baseball bat. Even assuming arguendo it was error for the trial court to allow Elwell to testify regarding the blood splatter pattern on the tee-shirt, we cannot conclude that her testimony prejudiced the outcome of the trial. See N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1443 (2005) ("A defendant is prejudiced by errors relating to rights arising other than under the Constitution of the United States when there is a reasonable possibility that, had the error in question not been committed, a different result would have been reached at the trial[.]"). In his closing argument, defense counsel admitted defendant was the one who wielded the baseball bat and struck the victim four times in the head. Defense counsel stated:
Something happened out there to make Mr. Lasiter pick up that bat and hit this guy four times. . . . He picked up that bat like that and hit him four times. . . . All we know is he was hit four times in the back of the head and something caused him to do that, but it was not after premeditation. . . . He didn't even think about it. He grabbed the bat and he hit him.
This assignment of error is overruled.
Finally, defendant contends the trial court erred by sentencing defendant on the attempted robbery conviction by making a finding in aggravation that had not been stipulated to by defendant or found beyond a reasonable doubt by the jury. Based on the principles set forth in Blakely v. Washington542 U.S. 296, 159 L. Ed. 2d 403 (2004), and State v. Allen359 N.C. 425, 615 S.E.2d 256 (2005), we agree, and remand for a new sentencing hearing on this offense.
No error in part, reversed and remanded for a new sentencing hearing in 04 CRS 2282.
Judges McCULLOUGH and ELMORE concur.

Comments

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This shows the level of stupidity we as Bloggers deal with on a daily basis. Tough guy comments on my post. Then chickens out and removes the post. Here is what he posted.

    Concerned kansan has left a new comment on your post "The Vanishing of Megan Renee Foglesong":

    You fuckers really need to grow up, labeling someone as a "piece of shit" is really fuckin mature. Until there is unsubstantiated proof of something then stop pointing fuckin fingers. I know Megan as well as David and I don't think he would ever in a million years do something like you are insinuating and the last time I saw Megan which was about 4 months before she went missing she was high as giraffe pussy on meth and told me she thought she might be pregnant and in the same breath she proceeded to snort another huge line of meth.

    Concerned kansan has left a new comment on your post "The Vanishing of Megan Renee Foglesong":

    She was hanging around a lot of bad people so any number of things could have happened involving any number of fucked up people. Last time I saw her she was doping it up with Brent Babcock so that tells you a lot....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I love how he says "Until there is unsubstantiated proof" LOL

      Delete
    2. I liked "High as Giraffe Pussy". Never heard that. Must be reminiscing about having sex with his farm animals again.

      Delete
    3. I have heard alot of rumors about this case. Did they ever search Cheyenne Bottoms?? And then there is another place between ellinwood and lyons. Its a man made well called wild bills well or something like that. I have heard both those places mentioned numerous times. And out by that well there cow creek. Its not far from Alden. Please someone check those places.Doesnt hurt to look right. I cant believe the kbi and police just let this case go cold.

      Delete
  3. Concerned Kansan is so IN-BRED He belongs in a sandwich. I love this part....
    "Until there is unsubstantiated proof of something then stop pointing fuckin fingers." Do you mean SUBSTANTIATED PROOF Cletus? Hey Kansan can you spell I-N-B-R-E-D?

    ReplyDelete
  4. LOL OMG I almost spit out the pizza I'm chewing @ ..."so IN-BRED He belongs in a sandwich." That's a new one for me! Beside the UNSUBSTANTIATED proof he wants...there is him taking issue with your "insuating" he (DM) did such and such. Luckily, there's a teaching moment right here in the post itself! If you were INSINUATING, it would be based on UNSTUBSTANTIATED rumor and such, but you are relaying info from his own history with the police and their DOCUMENTED or SUBSTANTIATED history of the his activities. See how that works? Stick to the little words. Maybe sign up for one of those word of the day apps to learn what the big words actually mean. Or read more. Reading is a great way to increase ones vocabulary - with understanding the word, not just tossing it out there. Not to mention that *unsubstantiated proof* is an oxymoron, and as such, a blaring indicator that your sentence is fucked up, but that's a lesson for another day. ;)

    I am not an expert on what qualigfies someone as an piece of shit, but I know one when I see one...haha. My unsubstantiated thought is evading police and kidnapping are on the list of criteria.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for the comment and reading my post. Yeah, After reading that comment I can see why he didn't have the sack to post something as nonsensical as that. After I read it I felt like a mosquito at a nudist colony. WHERE DO I BEGIN!? Didn't wanna tax his already limited mind. So I only chose a sentence fragment that he kindly provided. What can I say, The guy or gal is as sharp as a marble. I like your wit ;) Thanks again

      Delete
    2. I'm just now seeing this. Thanks for complimenting my wit. And to think, I hate writing. I think it's because I set the bar way too high - in all areas, wit, grammar, usage, etc. Or my grad school profs did... :/

      Delete
  5. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your opinions regarding people who live a certain way is just that. Your opinion. But you shouldn't diminish a victim regardless of what they do in their personal lives. People make mistakes. People don't deserve to go missing as a result of their mistakes. It doesn't matter to me whether you think its a good case or not.

      Delete
    2. I'm not certain who you're calling scum, but either you don't know Megan and are just making assumptions, or you know something and should be coming forward with your information. She is not a loser. Had a very bright future ahead of her until good old Kansas swallowed her up. Shame on you for downgrading any victim. That's the true meaning of scum. Megan is my daughter and I'll fight tooth and nail for her, without hiding behind a screen and a fake name.

      Delete
    3. I listened to The Vanished Podcast about Meagan today. It hits close to home with the relationship. I do believe David had something to do with it and Pam is not innocent she knows something. I get so angry when I think about the situation. I pray you will find the answers you need. I will be sure to bring awareness to her situation as often as humanly possible. God Bless

      Delete
  6. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I think David and Pam are responsible for Megans murder. Thanks writing the blogg.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Poor Megan. I was just looking at her Facebook page and all the pictures and she's always looking goofy, making faces, clowning around. She was a very attractive woman but even if she hadn't been, her smile and that sunny playful attitude displayed in the pictures would have made her beautiful.

    She made some mistakes, chiefly getting involved with a shitheel, but she didn't deserve whatever it was that happened to her.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No she doesn't. Madden is a piece of shit. He knows what happened.

      Delete
  9. Your blog sucks Your a loudmouthed bitch Doubt you are even from Kansas You know nothing Please kill yourself

    ReplyDelete
  10. Replies
    1. Gonna roll over and tell your mom what you just said

      Delete
    2. Wait....Youre gonna roll over and do the same? You put it to your own mom? I knew it! Youre just as inbred as David!

      Delete
    3. You piece if shit You better hope I never find you

      Delete
    4. You wont. Cuz I wont be putting to your mom anymore. If you hit it before I did we have a problem.

      Delete
    5. What are you gonna do? You cant do shit. You're the loudmouth. Loudmouthed Inbred. If I ever visit Kansas Asshole. Ill let you know and reply to your message here. I doubt you are man enough bitch.

      Delete
    6. You do that. Promis me you will do that

      Delete
    7. First thing Ill do is search all the trailer parks. But it'll be like searching for a needle in a haystack. All Ill see is white trash.

      Delete
    8. CrimeBlogger1983, You're so busy saying infantile things to this loser, calling him trailer trash and making yourself look as much of an idiot as he is, yet, you delete my statement that said everyone involved in this case is trailer trash because it goes against your grain that I am criticizing a particular strata of society. Hypocrite much? This chick lived an exceptionally high-risk lifestyle - she was morally bankrupt, just like her mother - thereby it is not surprising she would end up dead. If you find this offensive, I'm sure you voted for Hillary.

      Delete
    9. Hey Bitch, I'll delete what I want. WHEN I WANT. It's my blog. I deleted your comments because you were attacking a victim. Why don't you go cry hypocrite somewhere else. I have no use for you. Tell your story walkin bitch.

      Delete
    10. What I don't understand is the morons like you that get pissed about me talking shit about scumbags like Madden. You are literally more mad about me saying shit about them than they are with the victims of the cases people like Madden are involved with. Megan never hurt anyone. Who gives 2 shits if she lived a high risk lifestyle? Who gives a shit? That doesn't make it right she went missing. I don't care if you think she isnt worth finding. I don't give a shit about you calling me a hypocrite I don't give a shit about your opinion. Lady, Honestly I don't give a shit about you. You'd think you have better things to do. Like going to hell!

      Delete
    11. I'd really love to know your true identity, instead of hiding. Megan is nothing like her mother, she fell into the place, a kid craving love and affection from her "mother". That's all she wanted. She is a bright and loving girl. Cared about others so much. You don't know her. And she certainly didn't deserve this.

      Delete
    12. I'll pray for you msdoxma. And pray you never have to go thru something like this. I don't wish this on anyone, including the rude and nasty.

      Delete
  11. Yes this girl is a victim of a shitty Mum who picked herself over her daughter and this is exactly why she led a screwed up life, dating her Mum's ex boyfriend. None of this is normal and it's a tragic story. Blame her Mum and sick boyfriend. She never stood a chance.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular Posts

UPDATE: Dorothy Jane Scott

Part One

I've recently been in contact with Shawn Scott, Dorothy's son. He added some interesting things to my investigation of his mother's cold case. First off I was able to obtain a few pictures of Dorothy that he sent me. I wanted to see more than just the grainy newspaper pic we all have seen a thousand times. 








Also, Swinger's Psych Shop was a store that was previously owned by Dorothy's Father Jacob Scott. John Kycola purchased that store having already owned Custom John's Shop in Anaheim.




 Apparently there was a suspect that Shawn became aware of through several of Dorothy's friends who lived in Missouri. The suspects name was MIKE BUTLER. Apparently, Butler was an unstable individual who lived in the Santiago Mountains and was involved in cult activity. Which makes me think the dead dog that was discovered with her remains makes all the more sense now. Apparently he was obsessed with Dorothy. (Sound like our caller anyone?) His sister worked with Dorot…

Missing Beauty Queen:Tammy Lynn Leppert 7-6-83 Part-1

UNSOLVED MYSTERIES SEGMENT



October 12, 2016

I would first like to state that I have tried contacting Suzanne (Her sister) twice on two separate occasions and I have not heard back from her. I respect that she did not wish to speak with me. From what I have read there has been a lot of  trolling with internet assholes regarding the case. As well as with the Sitcoms Online board (Which at times has some good info on it but is maligned by a lot of trolls. (Wiseguy182) I would just like to say that I do not mean any ill will towards the family in writing this blog entry. I do not intentionally wish to disparage any ones character regarding this blog entry either. My heart goes out to the family of Tammy Lynn Leppert. This case has long since been of interest to me. Part One of this entry will deal with the disappearance. Part Two will deal with my opinion and analysis of the case. 
UPDATE:I HAVE HEARD BACK FROM SUZANNE. SHE IS BATTLING SOME HEALTH ISSUES. WHICH IS WHY IT TOOK SOME TIME FOR H…

The Mind Boggling Murder of Dorothy Jane Scott

Popular Song At The Time Prince: When Doves Cry Video Credit

TO ME, SHE EXEMPLIFIED THE WORD, GIVE. SHE’D JUST GIVE AND GIVE AND GIVE, NO MATTER WHAT IT COST HER … SHE SPENT HER LAST HOURS GIVING AND BEING CONCERNED ABOUT OTHERS.”


DOROTHY'S BROTHER JIM AT DOROTHY'S FUNERAL SERVICE
* NAME: DOROTHY JANE SCOTT * DATE OF BIRTH:4/23/48 * SON: SHANTI JACOB SCOTT (FATHER BEING DENNIS TERRY OF FAIRGROVE, MO)
via Ancestry.com
* PARENTS:VERA & JACOB SCOTT * LAST SEEN:PARKING LOT OF UCI MEDICAL CENTER ON 5/28/1980 AROUND 11:30 PM. *KILLED:MOST LIKELY THE NIGHT SHE DISAPPEARED. OR EARLY MORNING HOURS OF THE 29TH. * BODY DISCOVERED:8-6-1984 * CAUSE OF DEATH:UNDETERMINED
DOROTHY JANE SCOTT WAS A 32 YEAR OLD SINGLE MOTHER LIVING WITH HER 4 YEAR OLD SON AND AUNT IN STANTON, CALIFORNIA. SHE WAS DESCRIBED BY FRIEND/S AND FAMILY AS A KINDHEARTED COMPASSIONATE PERSON. SHE WAS ALSO DESCRIBED AS RELIGIOUS AND QUIET. ONE FRIEND DESCRIBED HER AS "DULL AS A PHONE BOOK" (REALLY?)  SHE IS REPORTED T…